Historical Perspective
The historical perspective is supervised by Dr. E. Zanin (comparative literature, IUF laureate, Ourisson Prize 2019), in order to explore how many issues concerning ethics, literature and the arts can get a better understanding with an in-depth analysis of their original context and historical evolution. Indeed, in the Middle Ages and in the Renaissance, the arts in Europe and in the Middle East were considered as a part of ethics, providing pleasure and ethical profit. Moreover, ethics was not a deontological discipline but rather an eudemonic practice: instead of giving moral rules, it aimed at explaining how to live a good life. Since narrative and paintings were practical examples of human deeds, displaying how to succeed (and how to fail) in private and public actions, reading a narrative, observing a painting or a play were considered useful ethical strategies. In the same way, rhetoric provided useful tools to live and to act in the public arena. Since the main goal of ethics was common happiness, harmonious music, beautiful objects and skillful speeches highly contributed to the ethical life. However, this early modern conception of arts and ethics progressively changed in the 17th and 18th centuries, giving way to new ethical and literary patterns. The exemplary value of literature was criticized as well as the casuistic approach to ethical issues; Aristotelian ethics was discarded at the same time that Aristotelian poetics was adopted, and the rise of Kantian ethics separated narrative from ethics, since the former describes particular situations while the latter prescribes abstract rules. If the history of literature and the history of ethics have received a large critical attention (see, for example, the 12 volumes collection of the Oxford English Literary History, 2004-2017, and the 3 volumes-set of The Development of Ethics, 2008-2009), the joint analysis of their evolution, relations and hierarchies have not yet been the object of a thorough study. Thanks to the contribution of art specialists (K. Gattinger), of specialists of the history of literature (M. Ott, E. Sempère), of drama (S. Berregard, E. Béhague, T. Victoroff, G. Ducrey) and of film (P. Werly, B. Thomas) in Europe (A. Bandry, V. Perdichizzi, F. Moghaddassi), in Africa (A. Mangeon, N. Chavoz), in the Arabic culture (A. Sakkal) and in Japan (A. Bechler, E. Lesigne-Audoly), as well as of scholars researching the history of ethics and literature (E. Zanin) and on moral writings (B. Guion), Lethica aims at reconstructing the evolving connection between ethics and the arts, and to confront its European forms to the various issues raised by ethical problems in non-European art, fiction and poetry.
This historical perspective will focus on some specific issues concerning the history of ethics, literature and the arts, namely:
a. Exemplarity: ancient apologues, medieval exempla, as well as Renaissance short stories and 18th century philosophical tales can indeed be read as narrative “cases”, thus contributing to the ethical debate. Conversely, the ethical relevance of narrative forms has been highly discussed by those who condemned casuistry, blamed fiction, or supported to the contrary its moral autonomy, sometimes on the ground of unethical concerns such as the end of 19th century Decadence artists and writers. We therefore aim to trace the history of the debate on the exemplar value of fiction considering its narrative and visual forms. Indeed, not only narratives but also medieval illuminations, Renaissance emblems, as well as 18th century allegorical paintings and 19th century caricatures or novels question the ethical value of stories and characters.
b. Deliberation: The form Aristotle has given to the pattern of deliberation is used in ethics, politics and rhetoric. This pattern encountered the Christian theology of the free will and holds a cardinal position in classical European drama and novels. It also served in modernity as a structural basis for decision-making in economics and politics, since “decision theory”, “games theory”, “public choice”, etc., often adopted the shape of an arborescence to figure a process of deliberation guided through the calculus of probabilities (such as in Pascal) or the form of a crossroads, as an allegory for choice. Both these forms have been used as topoi in numerous arts, especially in painting (see Carracci’s Hercules at the Crossroads), in the opera (such as Mozart’s Il Sogno di Scipione), or later in cinema.
c. Emotional responses: visual art, drama, fiction arouse emotions such as pity, fear, compassion or sympathy that tackle ethical issues. On the one side, arts and literature use ethical strategies to touch their audience: the reliability of the orator (ethos), the quality of the character (good, or bad), the issue of his or her actions (happiness or failure) set a frame of ethical expectations. On the other side, the audience emotionally responds to images and narratives. We would like to study how the ethical strategies and the emotional responses change over time and to examine how artistic, theatrical and narrative strategies aimed at touching the audience have evolved over the past centuries.
d. Censorship: the ethical value of the arts has been violently discussed by those who fear that fictionalization would degrade or subvert moral truth. This fear is still relevant today, when theatrical performance and fictional narrative are strongly censored on ideological or religious grounds. We aim to consider the history of censorship and its impact over artistic production, thus defining the boundaries between politics, ethics, and arts and their changing over time, in order to better understand how censorship has shaped literature (Darnton, 2014), pushing writers to invent new literary forms.